Introduction
Pre-IPO investing has become one of the fastest-growing opportunities for investors looking to capture early-stage value before companies list publicly. But unlike the public market, the Pre-IPO space demands structured evaluation, deeper due diligence, and data-backed decision frameworks to avoid overpaying or getting caught in hype cycles. The following guide distils the most important quantitative and qualitative checks every investor should follow. These insights will help you build conviction, assess risks objectively, and make smarter, data-driven allocation decisions in the Pre-IPO universe.
Why a quant lens for growth?
Great narratives are common; profitable, scalable growth is rare. A quantitative process helps you separate durable growers from expensive stories, keep emotions in check, and apply rules you can repeat across cycles without promising outcomes.
Compliance note: This is educational, not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
The growth investing stack (four pillars)
- Growth – top-line and unit economics acceleration
- Quality – profitability, balance-sheet strength, earnings reliability
- Price – valuation vs growth durability
- Trend – market confirmation via momentum and estimate revisions
You’ll score each pillar, then combine them into a single composite for ranking and sizing.
Pillar 1: Measuring “true” growth
Focus on rate + durability (not just one hot year).
- Revenue CAGR (3–5 yrs) and TTM YoY growth
- Operating leverage: ΔEBIT/ΔSales > 1 over multi-year periods
- Unit economics (if applicable): rising gross margin, stable CAC payback, improving contribution margin
- Cash conversion: OCF/Sales trending up; growth with cash discipline beats growth that burns cash
Scoring (0–25):
- Rev CAGR ≥ 20% → 8 pts; TTM YoY ≥ 20% → 6 pts
- 3-yr gross margin expansion ≥ 150 bps → 4 pts
- OCF/Sales rising and positive → 5 pts
- Working capital turns improving → 2 pts
Pillar 2: Quality filters to avoid “low-quality growth”
High growth with poor quality is fragile.
- ROCE / ROIC above sector median and rising
- Earnings quality: low accruals (CFO/Net Profit close to or >1 over cycle)
- Balance sheet: net debt/EBITDA < 2× (or net cash), interest coverage > 4×
- Volatility control: lower standard deviation of margins vs peers
Scoring (0–25):
- ROCE ≥ 18% and rising → 8 pts
- CFO/NP ≥ 1.0 over 3 yrs → 6 pts
- Net debt/EBITDA ≤ 1× or net cash → 6 pts
- EBIT margin volatility (3-yr sd) in bottom 40% of sector → 5 pts
Pillar 3: Paying the right price for growth
Valuation should reflect growth, quality, and risk not just scarcity.
- PEG-like views: P/E divided by medium-term EPS growth
- EV/Sales vs Rule-of-40 (for asset-light/platforms):
- Rule-of-40 = Revenue growth % + EBITDA margin %
- Prefer EV/Sales reasonable for names with Rule-of-40 > 40
- EV/EBITDA & FCF yield: watch for FCF inflexion often underpriced
Scoring (0–25):
- PEG (forward) ≤ 1.5 → 8 pts
- Rule-of-40 ≥ 40 or clear trajectory to ≥ 40 in 6–8 quarters → 8 pts
- FCF yield positive and improving → 5 pts
- Valuation within 25th–60th percentile of peer dispersion (not extreme) → 4 pts
Pillar 4: Trend & expectations let the market vote
Even the best stories fight headwinds if estimates trend down.
- Price momentum: 6–12 month total return vs index/sector
- Earnings revisions: net upward FY1/FY2 EPS changes in the last 90 days
- Volume/liquidity: rising 3-month average turnover; avoids illiquid traps
- Post-result drift: positive reaction sustains over 20 trading days
Scoring (0–25):
- 12-mo relative strength in top third of sector → 8 pts
- Net positive EPS revisions (FY1+FY2) → 7 pts
- Liquidity improving (ADV up ≥ 25% YoY) → 5 pts
- Positive post-result drift → 5 pts
The composite growth score (100-point model)
Add the four pillar scores. Examples of cut-offs (tune to your style):
- ≥ 75: Consider for buy-list (subject to risk checks)
- 60–74: Watchlist; seek catalysts (margin inflexion, deleveraging, capex completion)
- < 60: Avoid for now
Tip: Rebalance the score monthly; hard-code sector-neutral ranks so you don’t end up overweight only one hot industry.
A practical screening pipeline (India-ready)
- Universe: NSE 500 + profitable recent listings (post 4 quarters of data).
- Hard negatives (drop): Qualified audit remarks, repeated pledge spikes, CFO/NP < 0.6 for 3 yrs, persistent receivables stretch.
- Primary screen: Rev CAGR ≥ 15%, ROCE ≥ sector median, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 2×.
- Rank by composite score; enforce liquidity floors (e.g., ₹3–5 crore ADV).
- Manual review: Segment reliance, customer concentration, regulatory overhangs.
- Position sizing: Based on volatility, conviction, liquidity (see below).
- Risk controls & exits: Pre-defined stop rules, thesis checkpoints.
Position sizing & risk (keep winners, cut laggards)
- Vol-adjusted sizing: Target weight ∝ (Score / Stock volatility).
- Max single-name cap: e.g., 5–7% for diversified portfolios; lower for small/micro caps.
- Band rebalancing: Trim if weight > 1.25× target; add only if score stays ≥ 75.
- Exit rules:
- Thesis break (ROCE collapses, margin story derails)
- Two consecutive negative EPS revision cycles
- Price breaks long-term moving average and score < 60
Backtesting & validation (avoid overfitting)
- Holdout periods: Build rules on 2014–2019; validate on 2020–2023; live test 2024+.
- Transaction costs & slippage: Haircut returns conservatively (e.g., 75–100 bps per round trip for mid/small caps).
- Sector neutrality: Equal sector exposure or capped weights to avoid factor drift.
- Drawdown review: Prefer strategies with shallower max drawdowns even if CAGR is slightly lower.
Red flags that quant often catches early
- “Growth via receivables”: sales up, CFO flat/down, DSOs ballooning
- Margin pop from one-offs rather than mix/efficiency
- Equity raises dependence on funds for working capital
- Accounting quality slips: accrual spikes, frequent policy changes
- Promoter pledge surges not tied to benign reasons
Example: lightweight scorecard template
| Metric | Threshold | Points |
| Rev CAGR (3–5y) | ≥ 20% | 8 |
| TTM YoY Sales | ≥ 20% | 6 |
| Gross Margin Δ (3y) | ≥ +150 bps | 4 |
| OCF/Sales | Rising & >0 | 5 |
| ROCE | ≥ 18% & rising | 8 |
| CFO/NP | ≥ 1.0 | 6 |
| Net Debt/EBITDA | ≤ 1× | 6 |
| PEG (fwd) | ≤ 1.5 | 8 |
| Rule-of-40 | ≥ 40 | 8 |
| FCF Yield | Positive ↑ | 5 |
| 12-mo Rel Strength | Top third | 8 |
| EPS Revisions | Net positive | 7 |
| Liquidity Trend | ADV up ≥ 25% | 5 |
| Post-Result Drift | Positive | 5 |
| Total | /100 |
Behavioural guardrails (the human edge)
- Pre-commit to rules; don’t override lightly.
- Checklists before buying/selling to reduce bias.
Implementation notes for Indian investors
- Data cadence: Use quarterly updates for fundamentals; weekly for prices/revisions.
- Tax & turnover: High churn erodes post-tax returns; prefer longer holding periods where thesis holds.
- Diversification: Maintain 15–25 names; size satellites carefully.
Quick checklist (print-friendly)
- Growth is fast and getting more efficient (margins, cash).
- Quality is robust (ROCE high, accruals low, balance sheet clean).
- Valuation fair for durability (PEG, Rule-of-40, FCF inflexion).
- Trend & expectations support the thesis (momentum + revisions).
- Position size, exit rules, and review cadence are documented.
FAQs
1) Is PEG reliable for all sectors?
No. Use with judgment, cyclicals and financials need sector-specific metrics (credit costs, asset quality, underwriting cycles).
2) How many growth stocks should I hold?
For most investors, 15–25 diversified names balance conviction with risk. Avoid excessive micro-cap concentration.
3) What if a stock is expensive but scores high on growth/quality?
Track it on a watchlist. Enter on valuation resets or when FCF inflects.
4) How often should I rebalance?
Quarterly for fundamentals; monthly/quarterly for price-based trims if weights drift.
5) Can I rely only on quant?
Use quant to narrow the field, then do qualitative checks: management integrity, industry structure, regulatory risks.
Conclusion
A disciplined, quantitative framework lets you find and hold durable growers, not just fast growers. Score widely, size prudently, review relentlessly, and anchor decisions in cash economics rather than stories.
Invest smarter with Equentis Investech.
