Choosing between Portfolio Management Services (PMS) and mutual funds often comes down to one question: which has delivered better risk-adjusted outcomes over time for investors like me? The honest answer is: it depends on market cycles, manager skill, costs, and your own behaviour. Below is a clear, India-focused, compliance-safe guide to interpret historical performance and choose wisely.
PMS vs Mutual Funds at a Glance
| Criterion | PMS | Mutual Funds |
| Structure | SEBI-regulated discretionary/non-discretionary portfolios, securities held in the client’s demat account | Pooled vehicles managed by AMCs, units held in folios |
| Minimum Investment | ₹50 lakh (SEBI) | Low; SIPs from ₹100–₹500; lumpsum often ₹5,000–₹10,000 |
| Costs | Management fee; often a performance fee with a hurdle/high-watermark; brokerage & custody extra | Expense ratio within SEBI caps; no performance fee; exit loads possible |
| Taxation | Pass-through: you’re taxed like a direct equity holder (STCG/LTCG at applicable rates) | Equity/debt MF taxation as per category; tax occurs at redemption, not portfolio activity |
| Liquidity | Stocks sold in your account; settlement timelines apply | T+2/T+3 for redemptions (category dependent) |
| Reporting | Detailed stock-level statements, contract notes | NAV-based statements, factsheets |
Quick takeaway: PMS offers customization and concentrated bets; mutual funds offer diversification, simplicity, and cost efficiency.
How to Read “Historical Performance” Correctly
1) Look beyond point-to-point returns
- Use rolling returns (e.g., 3Y/5Y daily/monthly rolling windows). Rolling returns reveal how often a strategy beats its benchmark across market regimes.
- Prefer category- vs benchmark-adjusted views (e.g., PMS vs Nifty 500 TRI; flexi-cap MF vs Nifty 500 TRI).
- Check dispersion: top vs median vs bottom performers within each category.
2) Judge risk and consistency, not just highs
- Standard deviation & beta: capture volatility relative to the market.
- Max drawdown & recovery time: tells you how deep and how long underperformance lasted.
- Downside-capture ratio: key for capital protection in corrections.
- Hit ratio: % of periods beating benchmark.
3) Account for all costs and taxes
- PMS performance is often shown gross of client-specific costs; adjust for fees, brokerage, and performance fee structure.
- Mutual funds disclose net-of-expense NAV returns; they still account for exit loads and your tax bracket.
4) Align time horizon with strategy design
- Concentrated PMS needs longer evaluative windows (often 5–7 years) to let stock-specific alpha play out.
- Broad-market mutual funds can be assessed over 3–5 years for consistency.
Pro tip: Compare apples-to-apples large-cap PMS vs large-cap MF; small-cap PMS vs small-cap MF; not across styles.
What History Typically Shows (India Context)
While individual results vary by manager and cycle, these broad patterns are commonly observed:
- Bull markets favour concentrated PMS portfolios
- High-conviction stock picking can outperform on the upside, especially in mid/small-caps.
- Return dispersion is wide. Top-quartile PMS can meaningfully outpace both benchmarks and diversified MFs, but bottom-quartile PMS can lag.
- High-conviction stock picking can outperform on the upside, especially in mid/small-caps.
- Choppy/sideways markets favour cost-efficient mutual funds
- Expense ratios are lower, portfolios are diversified, and downside capture is typically better in broad categories like large-cap or index funds.
- Expense ratios are lower, portfolios are diversified, and downside capture is typically better in broad categories like large-cap or index funds.
- Small- & mid-cap cycles amplify differences
- PMS with discovery/turnaround themes may shine in liquidity-rich rallies but can see deeper drawdowns in risk-off phases.
- Small-cap mutual funds, though diversified, can also be volatile, but process discipline and rebalancing often reduce tail risks.
- PMS with discovery/turnaround themes may shine in liquidity-rich rallies but can see deeper drawdowns in risk-off phases.
- Manager selection dominates in PMS
- Alpha is manager- and capacity-sensitive; scaling AUM can dilute edge. Due diligence on team, process, and capacity is critical.
- Alpha is manager- and capacity-sensitive; scaling AUM can dilute edge. Due diligence on team, process, and capacity is critical.
Compliance-safe lens: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Use history to understand behaviour across cycles, not to predict outcomes.
A Simple, Reproducible Comparison Framework
Follow this 7-step checklist to compare any PMS strategy with a relevant mutual fund category:
- Define objective & risk budget: return target vs drawdown you can tolerate.
- Pick the right benchmarks: e.g., Nifty 500 TRI for flexi-cap, Nifty Midcap 150 TRI for mid-cap.
- Use rolling returns: 3Y and 5Y monthly rolling for at least 7–10 years of data (where available).
- Compute risk metrics: stdev, max drawdown, downside deviation, beta.
- Assess persistence: hit ratio, information ratio, and calendar-year consistency.
- Adjust for investor-level costs & tax: model PMS fees and tax frictions vs MF redemption taxation.
- Stress test: slice performance across 2008/2020/2022-23 type drawdowns and sharp rebounds.
Costs, Tax and Behaviour The Real Alpha
Costs
- PMS: Management fee (fixed) + performance fee (profit-sharing) with hurdle/high-watermark; brokerage, demat, and custody are extra. Costs can meaningfully impact post-fee alpha.
- Mutual Funds: Expense ratio (capped by SEBI), disclosed in NAV. No performance fee. Index funds/ETFs are the most cost-efficient.
Taxation (high-level summary)
- PMS: You realize capital gains as and when underlying trades settle in your demat; STCG/LTCG as per equity/debt rules. Turnover, therefore, has tax timing implications.
- Mutual Funds: Tax is triggered on redemption of units. Equity-oriented funds get equity taxation; debt categories follow prevailing rules. Always check the latest SEBI/Income Tax notifications and consult a tax advisor.
Behavioural Edge
- Concentration in PMS tests investor discipline during drawdowns. Exits after a bad quarter can lock in losses.
- Mutual funds with SIP/STP and automatic rebalancing reduce timing errors, a material source of long-term underperformance for DIY investors.
When PMS Historically Outperforms
- You can commit ₹50 lakh+ and stomach higher interim volatility.
- You believe in a specific edge (e.g., value turnarounds, special situations) and accept manager dispersion.
- You want bespoke exposure (sector tilts, position sizing, cash calls) not available in MFs.
When Mutual Funds Historically Win
- You prefer low costs, high diversification, and transparency.
- You want to automate investing via SIPs and avoid capital-gains frictions from high turnover.
- You value behavioural simplicity, stay invested through cycles with rebalancing.
Sample Comparison Matrix (Customize for Your Case)
| Metric | PMS Strategy A | Flexi-cap MF (Peer) |
| 5Y Rolling Return – Median | — | — |
| 5Y Rolling Return – Worst | — | — |
| Max Drawdown | — | — |
| Downside Capture (vs Nifty 500 TRI) | — | — |
| Information Ratio | — | — |
| Post-Fee, Post-Tax Estimate (Investor level) | — | — |
Populate the dashes with numbers from factsheets and PMS client statements. Focus on consistency and downside, not just the best-case point-to-point.
Real-World Portfolio Use-Cases
- Core–Satellite: Use low-cost index/flexi-cap mutual funds as core, add 1–2 high-conviction PMS as satellites for alpha.
- Goal-based buckets: Long-term equity goals (10Y+) can consider PMS satellites; near-term goals favour mutual funds and fixed income.
- Tax-aware rebalancing: Use mutual funds for efficient rebalancing; keep PMS turnover intentional to avoid tax drag.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Chasing last year’s winner looks at 5–10 year cycles and rolling data.
- Ignoring capacity and liquidity in PMS strategies, especially in small/mid caps.
- Underestimating fee impact performance fees can change your investor-level IRR.
- Mixing styles and comparing growth PMS to value MF leads to wrong conclusions.
- Behavioural churn: frequent switches, compound costs and taxes.
Helpful Reads from Equentis
- Active vs Passive PMS in India (2025)
- PMS for NRIs: Rules & Practical Tips
- CAGR vs Absolute Returns: MF Growth Metrics
- AIFs vs Mutual Funds: Diversification
- IPO Listing Timelines: SEBI Rules
FAQs
1) Has PMS beaten mutual funds historically?
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Top PMS managers have outperformed in certain cycles, especially in mid/small caps, while diversified mutual funds have won on consistency and downside control across longer horizons.
2) What is a fair evaluation period?
For PMS, 5–7 years (preferably across a full cycle). For mutual funds, 3–5 years with rolling-return checks.
3) Are PMS returns shown after fees and taxes?
Often, PMS returns are gross of investor-specific costs; always model your fee slab and taxes. Mutual fund returns are NAV-based (post-expense) but pre-tax at your end.
4) Which is better for SIPs?
Mutual funds are designed for SIPs/STPs and rupee-cost averaging. PMS generally suits lump-sum allocations with staged deployment.
5) Can I hold both?
Yes. Many investors use mutual funds for core exposure and PMS for satellite alpha with a written Investment Policy Statement (IPS).
Conclusion: Choose Process and Fit, Not Hype
Historical data is a guide, not a guarantee. PMS can add alpha when you pick the right manager, the right size, right horizon. Mutual funds compound wealth through cost efficiency, diversification, and behaviour-friendly design. The best portfolios often blend both, with clear expectations and periodic, rules-based reviews.
Invest smarter with Equentis Investech.
